James McCabe vs George Loffhagen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Jun at 03:36 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. McCabe vs G. Loffhagen

AUS
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: McCabe 2 - 0 Loffhagen
They have played 4 sets in total, with James McCabe winning 4 and George Loffhagen winning 0. The last match between James McCabe and George Loffhagen was at the Nottingham 2 Challenger, 16-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Grass, with James McCabe getting the victory 6-3 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| McCabe | 2 |
| Loffhagen | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) Nottingham 2 Challenger(06-16-25)
(F) M25 Nottingham(07-21-24)
J. McCabe vs G. Loffhagen H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $358,055 | Career Prize Money | $48,115 |
| 56.85% (166-126) | Career Total W/L | 64.42% (201-111) |
| 1 | Grass | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 9 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 25.00% (1-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-2) |
J. McCabe vs G. Loffhagen Match Preview:
- How do second serve points affect the match's outcome? Mc Cabe wins 43.97% of second serve points lately, while Loffhagen secures 48.21%, suggesting a slight edge for Loffhagen.
- In terms of returning second serves, Mc Cabe has a slight advantage, capturing 46.93% from opponents compared to Loffhagen's 42.27%.
- First serve return points are also critical; Mc Cabe edges Loffhagen with 23.23% compared to 21.13%.
- Both players perform similarly under pressure, with Mc Cabe saving 58.02% of break points and Loffhagen 56.03%.
- Loffhagen boasts an impressive match record over the past year, winning 78.18% of matches, while Mc Cabe hasn't secured a victory.
- What about their direct head-to-head record? Mc Cabe won their only encounter decisively, despite Loffhagen's overall better year performance.
- Match durations between them average 58 minutes, highlighting Mc Cabe's past dominance with straightforward wins.
- No matches have gone into deciding sets or tiebreaks, leaving undecided extreme pressure outcomes between them.
- Loffhagen has performed significantly better against higher-ranked opponents across the past year.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Loffhagen has a clear advantage, having won 63% of such sets versus Mc Cabe's none.
- A closer look at break point conversion reveals Mc Cabe converts 32.39% of chances, slightly outperforming Loffhagen's 28.57%.
Editorial Prediction (June 16, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Mc Cabe and Loffhagen holds intriguing dynamics. While Loffhagen shows stronger recent form and consistent high performance over the past year, Mc Cabe's past victory and stronger return game could influence the outcome.
Mc Cabe's superior break point conversion rate, alongside his advantage in returning second and first serve points, suggests potential for capitalizing on Loffhagen's serve under pressure. However, Loffhagen's better second serve performance and deciding set record are factors that shouldn't be overlooked.
Given Loffhagen's impressive win rate over the past year and overall better performance against higher-ranked players, Loffhagen is slightly favored to win this match.
James McCabe vs George Loffhagen Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. McCabe vs G. Loffhagen H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 25 | Games Won | 10 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 8 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:26:32 | Average Match Time | 1:26:32 |
| 69% (84/122) | 1st Serve % | 46% (50/109) |
| 80% (67/84) | 1st Serve Win % | 76% (38/50) |
| 50% (19/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (22/59) |
| 46% (6/13) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/8) |
| 45% (49/109) | Return Points Win % | 30% (36/122) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. McCabe Recent Matches Played
G. Loffhagen Recent Matches Played

J. McCabe vs G. Loffhagen Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.85% (166/126) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.42% (201/111) |
| 54.71% (372/308) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.88% (451/255) |
| 51.67% (3374/3156) | Games Win/Loss | 55.69% (3653/2907) |
| 60.09% (137/91) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.63% (105/48) |
| 40.00% (12/18) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.58% (38/28) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 69.86% (51/22) |
| 53.57% (15/13) | Grass Win/Loss | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 0.63 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 2006 | Aces Total | 1290 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 654 | Total Double Faults | 781 |
| 1:43:43 | Average Match Time | 1:28:35 |
| 367.88 | Average Opponent Rank | 423.88 |
| 60% (11880/19778) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10091/16569) |
| 72% (8605/11880) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (7215/10091) |
| 49% (3874/7898) | 2nd Serve Win % | 53% (3409/6478) |
| 41% (707/1740) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (817/1894) |
| 37% (7353/19625) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7390/17832) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Slam W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 31.58% (6/13) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 52.26% (81/74) | Challenger W/L | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 70.87% (73/30) | Futures W/L | 66.54% (181/91) |
| 57% (159/279) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (200/304) |
| 38% (3/8) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 52% (66/127) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (46/90) |
| 58% (53/92) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (37/85) |
| 87% (155/135) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (220/189) |
| 13% (155/20) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (220/29) |
| 23% (137/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (92/13) |